Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 4 authors, 2021-01-12

Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: hugetlb: fix a race between freeing and dissolving the page

From: Muchun Song <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-12 15:07:30
Also in: lkml, stable

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:37 PM Michal Hocko [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue 12-01-21 19:43:21, Muchun Song wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 7:17 PM Michal Hocko [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue 12-01-21 18:13:02, Muchun Song wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 6:02 PM Michal Hocko [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sun 10-01-21 20:40:14, Muchun Song wrote:
[...]
quoted
@@ -1770,6 +1788,14 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
              int nid = page_to_nid(head);
              if (h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0)
                      goto out;
+
+             /*
+              * We should make sure that the page is already on the free list
+              * when it is dissolved.
+              */
+             if (unlikely(!PageHugeFreed(head)))
+                     goto out;
+
Do you really want to report EBUSY in this case? This doesn't make much
sense to me TBH. I believe you want to return 0 same as when you race
and the page is no longer PageHuge.
Return 0 is wrong. Because the page is not freed to the buddy allocator.
IIUC, dissolve_free_huge_page returns 0 when the page is already freed
to the buddy allocator. Right?
0 is return when the page is either dissolved or it doesn't need
dissolving. If there is a race with somebody else freeing the page then
there is nothing to dissolve. Under which condition it makes sense to
report the failure and/or retry dissolving?
If there is a race with somebody else freeing the page, the page
can be freed to the hugepage pool not the buddy allocator. Do
you think that this page is dissolved?
OK, I see what you mean. Effectively the page would be in a limbo, not
yet in the pool nor in the allocator but it can find its way to the
either of the two. But I still dislike returning a failure because that
would mean e.g. memory hotplug to fail. Can you simply retry inside this
code path (drop the lock, cond_resched and retry)?
Yeah. This is what I want to do (making the memory hotplug as
successful as possible). So I send the patch:

  [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: hugetlb: add return -EAGAIN for dissolve_free_huge_page

Adding a simple retry inside this function when hitting this race is
also fine to me. I can do that.



--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help