Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] fs/task_mmu: acquire mmap_lock for write on soft-dirty cleanup
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-01-05 22:17:37
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:22:51PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
quoted
On Jan 5, 2021, at 12:39 PM, Andrea Arcangeli [off-list ref] wrote: On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:26:43PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:quoted
quoted
On Jan 5, 2021, at 10:20 AM, Andrea Arcangeli [off-list ref] wrote: On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 01:25:29AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:quoted
Fixes: 0f8975ec4db2 ("mm: soft-dirty bits for user memory changes tracking")Targeting a backport down to 2013 when nothing could wrong in practice with page_mapcount sounds backwards and unnecessarily risky. In theory it was already broken and in theory 09854ba94c6aad7886996bfbee2530b3d8a7f4f4 is absolutely perfect and the previous code of 2013 is completely wrong, but in practice the code from 2013 worked perfectly until Aug 21 2020.Well… If you consider the bug that Will recently fixed [1], then soft-dirty was broken (for a different, yet related reason) since 0758cd830494 ("asm-generic/tlb: avoid potential double flush”). This is not to say that I argue that the patch should be backported to 2013, just to say that memory corruption bugs can be unnoticed. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/patch/20201210121110.10094-2-will@kernel.org/Is this a fix or a cleanup? The above is precisely what I said earlier that tlb_gather had no reason to stay in clear_refs and it had to use inc_tlb_flush_pending as mprotect, but it's not a fix? Is it? I suggested it as a pure cleanup. So again no backport required. The commit says fix this but it means "clean this up".It is actually a fix. I think the commit log is not entirely correct and should include: Fixes: 0758cd830494 ("asm-generic/tlb: avoid potential double flush”). Since 0758cd830494, calling tlb_finish_mmu() without any previous call to pte_free_tlb() and friends does not flush the TLB. The soft-dirty bug producer that I sent fails without this patch of Will.
Yes, it's a fix, but I didn't rush it for 5.10 because I don't think rushing this sort of thing does anybody any favours. I agree that the commit log should be updated; I mentioned this report in the cover letter: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CA+32v5zzFYJQ7eHfJP-2OHeR+6p5PZsX=RDJNU6vGF3hLO+j-g@mail.gmail.com/ (local) demonstrating that somebody has independently stumbled over the missing TLB invalidation in userspace, but it's not as bad as the other issues we've been discussing in this thread. Will