Re: [v4 PATCH 04/11] mm: vmscan: remove memcg_shrinker_map_size
From: Yang Shi <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-25 21:08:14
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
Subsystem:
memory management, memory management - mglru (multi-gen lru), memory management - reclaim, the rest · Maintainers:
Andrew Morton, Johannes Weiner, Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:36 AM Kirill Tkhai [off-list ref] wrote:
On 22.01.2021 02:06, Yang Shi wrote:quoted
Both memcg_shrinker_map_size and shrinker_nr_max is maintained, but actually the map size can be calculated via shrinker_nr_max, so it seems unnecessary to keep both. Remove memcg_shrinker_map_size since shrinker_nr_max is also used by iterating the bit map. Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <redacted> --- mm/vmscan.c | 16 +++++++--------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index d3f3701dfcd2..40e7751ef961 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c@@ -185,8 +185,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list); static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem); #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG - -static int memcg_shrinker_map_size; +static int shrinker_nr_max; static void free_shrinker_map_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) {@@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) return 0; down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); - size = memcg_shrinker_map_size; + size = (shrinker_nr_max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long); for_each_node(nid) { map = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid); if (!map) {@@ -266,10 +265,11 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id) { int size, old_size, ret = 0; + int new_nr_max = new_id + 1; struct mem_cgroup *memcg; - size = DIV_ROUND_UP(new_id + 1, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long); - old_size = memcg_shrinker_map_size; + size = (new_nr_max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long); + old_size = (shrinker_nr_max / BITS_PER_LONG + 1) * sizeof(unsigned long); if (size <= old_size) return 0;This looks a BUG: expand_shrinker_maps(id == 1) { old_size = 64; size = 64; ===>return 0 and shrinker_nr_max remains 0. } Then shrink_slab_memcg() misses this shrinker since shrinker_nr_max == 0.
Yes, thanks for catching this. It should be fixed by the below patch:
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index bb254d39339f..47010a69b400 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id) old_d_size = shrinker_nr_max * sizeof(atomic_long_t); old_size = old_m_size + old_d_size; if (size <= old_size) - return 0; + goto out; if (!root_mem_cgroup) goto out;
quoted
@@ -286,9 +286,10 @@ static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id) goto out; } } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL); + out: if (!ret) - memcg_shrinker_map_size = size; + shrinker_nr_max = new_nr_max; return ret; }@@ -321,7 +322,6 @@ void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id) #define SHRINKER_REGISTERING ((struct shrinker *)~0UL) static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr); -static int shrinker_nr_max; static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) {@@ -338,8 +338,6 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker) idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id); goto unlock; } - - shrinker_nr_max = id + 1; } shrinker->id = id; ret = 0;