Thread (90 messages) 90 messages, 17 authors, 2022-02-16

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: Trial do_wp_page() simplification

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Date: 2020-09-17 22:09:04
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 05:40:59PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:35:56PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted
For that to happen, we'd need to have the vma flag so that we wouldn't
have any worry about non-pinners, but as you suggested, I think even
just a mm-wide counter - or flag - to deal with the fast-bup case is
likely perfectly sufficient.
Would mm_struct.pinned_vm suffice?
I think that could be a good long term goal

IIRC last time we dug into the locked_vm vs pinned_vm mess it didn't
get fixed. There is a mix of both kinds, as you saw, and some
resistance I don't clearly remember to changing it.

My advice for this -rc fix is to go with a single bit in the mm_struct
set on any call to pin_user_pages*

Then only users using pin_user_pages and forking are the only ones who
would ever do extra COW on fork. I think that is OK for -rc, this
workload should be rare due to the various historical issues. Anyhow,
a slow down regression is better than a it is broken regression.

This can be improved into a counter later. Due to the pinned_vm
accounting all call sites should have the mm_struct at unpin, but I
have a feeling it will take a alot of driver patches to sort it all
out.

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help