Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: improve count_partial() for CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL

On 2/24/20 5:57 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:29:09AM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:

quoted

On Sat, 22 Feb 2020, Wen Yang wrote:

Hello, Christopher!

quoted

quoted

We also observed that in this scenario, CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL is turned
on by default, and count_partial() is useless because the returned number
is far from the reality.

Well its not useless. Its just not counting the partial objects in per cpu
partial slabs. Those are counted by a different counter it.

Do you mean CPU_PARTIAL_ALLOC or something else?

"useless" isn't the most accurate wording, sorry for that.

The point is that the number of active objects displayed in /proc/slabinfo
is misleading if percpu partial lists are used. So it's strange to pay
for it by potentially slowing down concurrent allocations.

Hmm, I wonder... kmem_cache_cpu has those quite detailed stats with
CONFIG_SLUB_STATS. Could perhaps the number of free object be
reconstructed from them by adding up / subtracting the relevant items
across all CPUs? Expensive, but the cost would be taken by the
/proc/slabinfo reader, without blocking anyone.

Then again, CONFIG_SLUB_STATS is disabled by default. But the same
percpu mechanism could be used to create some "stats light" variant that
doesn't count everything, just what's needed to track number of free
objects. Percpu should mean the atomic inc/decs wouldn't cause much
contention...

It's certainly useful to have an idea of slab fragmentation (low inuse
vs total object) from /proc/slabinfo. But if that remains available via
/sys/kernel/slab/ then I guess it's fine... until all continuous
monitoring tools that now read /proc/slabinfo periodically start reading
all those /sys/kernel/slab/ files periodically...