Re: [PATCH] fork: Improve error message for corrupted page tables
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-06 03:13:11
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 15:28 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 8/2/19 8:46 AM, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+static const char * const resident_page_types[NR_MM_COUNTERS] = { + "MM_FILEPAGES", + "MM_ANONPAGES", + "MM_SWAPENTS", + "MM_SHMEMPAGES", +};But please let's not put this in a header file. We're asking the compiler to put a copy of all of this into every compilation unit which includes the header. Presumably the compiler is smart enough not to do that, but it's not good practice.Thanks for the explanation. Makes sense to me. Just wanted to check before sending V2, Is it OK if I add this to kernel/fork.c? or do you have something else in mind?I was thinking somewhere like mm/util.c so the array could be used by other code. But it seems there is no such code. Perhaps it's best to just leave fork.c as it is now.Ok, so does that mean have the struct in header file itself?If the struct definition (including the string values) was in mm/util.c, there would have to be a declaration in a header. If it's in fork.c with the only users, there doesn't need to be separate declaration in a header.
Makes sense.
quoted
Sorry! for too many questions. I wanted to check with you before changing because it's *the* fork.c file (I presume random changes will not be encouraged here) I am not yet clear on what's the right thing to do here :( So, could you please help me in deciding.fork.c should be fine, IMHO
I was leaning to add struct definition in fork.c as well but just wanted to check with Andrew before posting V2. Thanks for the reply though :) Regards, Sai