Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] mm: Extend copy_vma()
From: Kirill Tkhai <hidden>
Date: 2019-05-21 08:48:38
Also in:
linux-api, lkml
Hi, Kirill, On 21.05.2019 11:18, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 05:00:12PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:quoted
This prepares the function to copy a vma between two processes. Two new arguments are introduced.This kind of changes requires a lot more explanation in commit message, describing all possible corner cases> For instance, I would really like to see a story on why logic around need_rmap_locks is safe after the change.
Let me fast answer on the below question firstly, and later I'll write wide explanations, since this requires much more time.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <redacted> --- include/linux/mm.h | 4 ++-- mm/mmap.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- mm/mremap.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 0e8834ac32b7..afe07e4a76f8 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h@@ -2329,8 +2329,8 @@ extern void __vma_link_rb(struct mm_struct *, struct vm_area_struct *, struct rb_node **, struct rb_node *); extern void unlink_file_vma(struct vm_area_struct *); extern struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct vm_area_struct **, - unsigned long addr, unsigned long len, pgoff_t pgoff, - bool *need_rmap_locks); + struct mm_struct *, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len, + pgoff_t pgoff, bool *need_rmap_locks, bool clear_flags_ctx); extern void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *); static inline int check_data_rlimit(unsigned long rlim,diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index 57803a0a3a5c..99778e724ad1 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c@@ -3195,19 +3195,21 @@ int insert_vm_struct(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma) } /* - * Copy the vma structure to a new location in the same mm, - * prior to moving page table entries, to effect an mremap move. + * Copy the vma structure to new location in the same vma + * prior to moving page table entries, to effect an mremap move; */ struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct vm_area_struct **vmap, - unsigned long addr, unsigned long len, pgoff_t pgoff, - bool *need_rmap_locks) + struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, + unsigned long len, pgoff_t pgoff, + bool *need_rmap_locks, bool clear_flags_ctx) { struct vm_area_struct *vma = *vmap; unsigned long vma_start = vma->vm_start; - struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; + struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx uctx; struct vm_area_struct *new_vma, *prev; struct rb_node **rb_link, *rb_parent; bool faulted_in_anon_vma = true; + unsigned long flags; /* * If anonymous vma has not yet been faulted, update new pgoff@@ -3220,15 +3222,25 @@ struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct vm_area_struct **vmap, if (find_vma_links(mm, addr, addr + len, &prev, &rb_link, &rb_parent)) return NULL; /* should never get here */ - new_vma = vma_merge(mm, prev, addr, addr + len, vma->vm_flags, - vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file, pgoff, vma_policy(vma), - vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx); + + uctx = vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx; + flags = vma->vm_flags; + if (clear_flags_ctx) { + uctx = NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX; + flags &= ~(VM_UFFD_MISSING | VM_UFFD_WP | VM_MERGEABLE | + VM_LOCKED | VM_LOCKONFAULT | VM_WIPEONFORK | + VM_DONTCOPY); + }Why is the new logic required? No justification given.
Ditto.
quoted
+ + new_vma = vma_merge(mm, prev, addr, addr + len, flags, vma->anon_vma, + vma->vm_file, pgoff, vma_policy(vma), uctx); if (new_vma) { /* * Source vma may have been merged into new_vma */ if (unlikely(vma_start >= new_vma->vm_start && - vma_start < new_vma->vm_end)) { + vma_start < new_vma->vm_end) && + vma->vm_mm == mm) {How can vma_merge() succeed if vma->vm_mm != mm?
We don't use vma as an argument of vma_merge(). We use vma as a source of vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file and vma_policy(). We search some new_vma in mm with the same characteristics as vma has in vma->vm_mm. In case of success vma_merge() returns it for us. For example, it may success, when vma->vm_mm is mm_struct of forked process, while mm is mm_struct of its parent. [...] Kirill