Thread (71 messages) 71 messages, 11 authors, 2018-10-16

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 24/27] mm/mmap: Create a guard area between VMAs

From: Eugene Syromiatnikov <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-03 21:21:29
Also in: linux-api, linux-arch, linux-doc, lkml

On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 06:52:40PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:32 PM Eugene Syromiatnikov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I'm not sure, however, whether such a change that provides no ability
to configure or affect it will go well with all the supported
architectures.
Is there a concrete reason why you think an architecture might not
like this? As far as I can tell, the virtual address space overhead
should be insignificant even for 32-bit systems.
Not really, and not architectures per se, but judging by some past
experiences with enabling ASLR, I would expect that all kinds of weird
applications may start to behave in all kinds of strange ways.

Not that I have anything more than this doubt, however; but this sort of
change without any ability to tune or revert it still looks unusual to me.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help