Re: [RFC PATCH v4 24/27] mm/mmap: Create a guard area between VMAs
From: Eugene Syromiatnikov <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-03 21:21:29
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-doc, lkml
From: Eugene Syromiatnikov <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-03 21:21:29
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-doc, lkml
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 06:52:40PM +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:32 PM Eugene Syromiatnikov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I'm not sure, however, whether such a change that provides no ability to configure or affect it will go well with all the supported architectures.Is there a concrete reason why you think an architecture might not like this? As far as I can tell, the virtual address space overhead should be insignificant even for 32-bit systems.
Not really, and not architectures per se, but judging by some past experiences with enabling ASLR, I would expect that all kinds of weird applications may start to behave in all kinds of strange ways. Not that I have anything more than this doubt, however; but this sort of change without any ability to tune or revert it still looks unusual to me.