On 8/16/18 7:00 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.08.2018 12:47, Oscar Salvador wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:06:26PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
quoted
+
+/* check if all mem sections are offline */
+bool mem_sections_offline(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
+{
+ for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
+ unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!valid_section_nr(section_nr)))
+ continue;
+ if (online_section_nr(section_nr))
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
AFAICS pages_correctly_probed will catch this first.
pages_correctly_probed checks for the section to be:
- present
- valid
- !online
Right, I missed that function.
quoted
Maybe it makes sense to rename it, and write another pages_correctly_probed routine
for the offline case.
So all checks would stay in memory_block_action level, and we would not need
the mem_sections_offline/online stuff.
I am OK with that, but will wait for a patch to review.
Pavel