[PATCH 7/7] mm/hmm: proper support for blockable mmu_notifier
From: <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-24 19:26:14
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
hmm - heterogeneous memory management, memory management, the rest · Maintainers:
Jason Gunthorpe, Leon Romanovsky, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds
From: JA(C)rA'me Glisse <redacted> When mmu_notifier calls invalidate_range_start callback with blockable set to false we should not sleep. Properly propagate this to HMM users. Signed-off-by: JA(C)rA'me Glisse <redacted> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Ralph Campbell <redacted> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> --- include/linux/hmm.h | 12 +++++++++--- mm/hmm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index 064924bce75c..c783916f8732 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h@@ -287,11 +287,13 @@ enum hmm_update_event { * @start: virtual start address of the range to update * @end: virtual end address of the range to update * @event: event triggering the update (what is happening) + * @blockable: can the callback block/sleep ? */ struct hmm_update { unsigned long start; unsigned long end; enum hmm_update_event event; + bool blockable; }; /*
@@ -314,6 +316,8 @@ struct hmm_mirror_ops { * * @mirror: pointer to struct hmm_mirror * @update: update informations (see struct hmm_update) + * Returns: -EAGAIN if update.blockable false and callback need to + * block, 0 otherwise. * * This callback ultimately originates from mmu_notifiers when the CPU * page table is updated. The device driver must update its page table
@@ -322,10 +326,12 @@ struct hmm_mirror_ops { * * The device driver must not return from this callback until the device * page tables are completely updated (TLBs flushed, etc); this is a - * synchronous call. + * synchronous call. If driver need to sleep and update->blockable is + * false then you need to abort (do not do anything that would sleep or + * block) and return -EAGAIN. */ - void (*sync_cpu_device_pagetables)(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, - const struct hmm_update *update); + int (*sync_cpu_device_pagetables)(struct hmm_mirror *mirror, + const struct hmm_update *update); }; /*
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index 6fe31e2bfa1e..1d8fcaa0606f 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c@@ -123,12 +123,18 @@ void hmm_mm_destroy(struct mm_struct *mm) kfree(mm->hmm); } -static void hmm_invalidate_range(struct hmm *hmm, bool device, - const struct hmm_update *update) +static int hmm_invalidate_range(struct hmm *hmm, bool device, + const struct hmm_update *update) { struct hmm_mirror *mirror; struct hmm_range *range; + /* + * It is fine to wait on lock here even if update->blockable is false + * as the hmm->lock is only held for short period of time (when adding + * or walking the ranges list). We could also convert the range list + * into a lru list and avoid the spinlock all together. + */ spin_lock(&hmm->lock); list_for_each_entry(range, &hmm->ranges, list) { unsigned long addr, idx, npages;
@@ -145,12 +151,26 @@ static void hmm_invalidate_range(struct hmm *hmm, bool device, spin_unlock(&hmm->lock); if (!device) - return; + return 0; + /* + * It is fine to wait on mirrors_sem here even if update->blockable is + * false as this semaphore is only taken in write mode for short period + * when adding a new mirror to the list. + */ down_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem); - list_for_each_entry(mirror, &hmm->mirrors, list) - mirror->ops->sync_cpu_device_pagetables(mirror, update); + list_for_each_entry(mirror, &hmm->mirrors, list) { + int ret; + + ret = mirror->ops->sync_cpu_device_pagetables(mirror, update); + if (!update->blockable && ret == -EAGAIN) { + up_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem); + return -EAGAIN; + } + } up_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem); + + return 0; } static void hmm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
@@ -188,17 +208,13 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct hmm_update update; struct hmm *hmm = mm->hmm; - if (!blockable) - return -EAGAIN; - VM_BUG_ON(!hmm); update.start = start; update.end = end; update.event = HMM_UPDATE_INVALIDATE; - hmm_invalidate_range(hmm, true, &update); - - return 0; + update.blockable = blockable; + return hmm_invalidate_range(hmm, true, &update); } static void hmm_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
@@ -214,6 +230,7 @@ static void hmm_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn, update.start = start; update.end = end; update.event = HMM_UPDATE_INVALIDATE; + update.blockable = true; hmm_invalidate_range(hmm, false, &update); }
--
2.17.1