Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix comment for NODEMASK_ALLOC
From: Oscar Salvador <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-23 10:51:37
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 01:51:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:30:24 +0200 Oscar Salvador [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 02:17:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
We do have CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10 in our SLES kernels for quite some time (around SLE11-SP3 AFAICS). Anyway, isn't NODES_ALLOC over engineered a bit? Does actually even do larger than 1024 NUMA nodes? This would be 128B and from a quick glance it seems that none of those functions are called in deep stacks. I haven't gone through all of them but a patch which checks them all and removes NODES_ALLOC would be quite nice IMHO.No, maximum we can get is 1024 NUMA nodes. I checked this when writing another patch [1], and since having gone through all archs Kconfigs, CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10 is the limit. NODEMASK_ALLOC gets only called from: - unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes() (not anymore after [1]) - __nr_hugepages_store_common (This does not seem to have a deep stack, we could use a normal nodemask_t) But is also used for NODEMASK_SCRATCH (mainly used for mempolicy): struct nodemask_scratch { nodemask_t mask1; nodemask_t mask2; }; that would make 256 bytes in case CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10.And that sole site could use an open-coded kmalloc.
It is not really one single place, but four: - do_set_mempolicy() - do_mbind() - kernel_migrate_pages() - mpol_shared_policy_init() They get called in: - do_set_mempolicy() - From set_mempolicy syscall - From numa_policy_init() - From numa_default_policy() * All above do not look like they have a deep stack, so it should be possible to get rid of NODEMASK_SCRATCH there. - do_mbind - From mbind syscall * Should be feasible here as well. - kernel_migrate_pages() - From migrate_pages syscall * Again, this should be doable. - mpol_shared_policy_init() - From hugetlbfs_alloc_inode() - shmem_get_inode() * Seems doable for hugetlbfs_alloc_inode as well. I only got to check hugetlbfs_alloc_inode, because shmem_get_inode So it seems that this can be done in most of the places. The only tricky function might be mpol_shared_policy_init because of shmem_get_inode. But in that case, we could use an open-coded kmalloc there. Thanks -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3