Re: [PATCH v11 01/26] mm: introduce CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2018-05-17 17:20:30
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2018-05-17 17:20:30
Also in:
linuxppc-dev, lkml
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:36:00AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
quoted
+ If the speculative page fault fails because of a concurrency isbecause a concurrency is
While one can use concurrency as a noun, it sounds archaic to me. I'd rather: If the speculative page fault fails because a concurrent modification is detected or because underlying PMD or PTE tables are not yet
quoted
+ detected or because underlying PMD or PTE tables are not yet + allocating, it is failing its processing and a classic page faultallocated, the speculative page fault fails and a classic page faultquoted
+ is then tried.