Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 6 authors, 2019-05-01

Re: [RFC] Warn the user when they could overflow mapcount

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2018-02-08 18:56:48
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 01:05:33PM -0500, Daniel Micay wrote:
The standard map_max_count / pid_max are very low and there are many
situations where either or both need to be raised.
[snip good reasons]
I do think the default value in the documentation should be fixed but
if there's a clear problem with raising these it really needs to be
fixed. Google either of the sysctl names and look at all the people
running into issues and needing to raise them. It's only going to
become more common to raise these with people trying to use lots of
fine-grained sandboxing. Process-per-request is back in style.
So we should make the count saturate instead, then?  That's going to
be interesting.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help