On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Borislav Petkov [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:51:25AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

quoted

with the slight caveat that I think it might be a wee bit better if
UMIP emulation used a separate define UMIP_REPORTED_CR0.

Why, do you see CR0_STATE and UMIP_REPORTED_CR0 becoming different at
some point?

I'm assuming that UMIP_REPORTED_CR0 will never change.  If CR0 gets a
new field that we set some day, then I assume that CR0_STATE would add
that bit but UMIP_REPORTED_CR0 would not.

--
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>