Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] cramfs: direct memory access support
From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-03 15:06:30
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-03 15:06:30
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 06:27:11PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:quoted
If you prefer, the physical address could be specified with a Kconfig symbol just like the kernel link address. Personally I think it is best to keep it along with the other root mount args. But going all the way with a dynamic driver binding interface and a dummy intermediate name is like using a sledge hammer to kill an ant: it will work of course, but given the context it is prone to errors due to the added manipulations mentioned previously ... and a tad overkill.As soon as a kernel enables CRAMFS_PHYSMEM this mount option is available, so you don't just need to think of your use case.
What other use cases do you have in mind?
The normal way for doings this would be to specify it in the device tree.
And specify it how? Creating a pseudo device and passing that instead of the actual physical address? What is the advantage? And what about targets that don't use DT? Yes, there are still quite a few out there. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>