Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 5 authors, 2017-10-05

Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] cramfs: direct memory access support

From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-03 15:06:30
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 06:27:11PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted
If you prefer, the physical address could be specified with a Kconfig 
symbol just like the kernel link address. Personally I think it is best 
to keep it along with the other root mount args. But going all the way 
with a dynamic driver binding interface and a dummy intermediate name is 
like using a sledge hammer to kill an ant: it will work of course, but 
given the context it is prone to errors due to the added manipulations 
mentioned previously ... and a tad overkill.
As soon as a kernel enables CRAMFS_PHYSMEM this mount option is
available, so you don't just need to think of your use case.
What other use cases do you have in mind?
The normal way for doings this would be to specify it in the device
tree.
And specify it how? Creating a pseudo device and passing that instead of 
the actual physical address? What is the advantage?

And what about targets that don't use DT? Yes, there are still quite a 
few out there.


Nicolas

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help