Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2017-09-29

Re: [PATCH v4] mm: introduce validity check on vm dirtiness settings

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2017-09-26 23:59:53

On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:12:32 +0800 Yafang Shao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
we can find the logic in domain_dirty_limits() that
when dirty bg_thresh is bigger than dirty thresh,
bg_thresh will be set as thresh * 1 / 2.
	if (bg_thresh >= thresh)
		bg_thresh = thresh / 2;

But actually we can set vm background dirtiness bigger than
vm dirtiness successfully. This behavior may mislead us.
We'd better do this validity check at the beginning.

...
--- a/Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt
@@ -156,6 +156,9 @@ read.
 Note: the minimum value allowed for dirty_bytes is two pages (in bytes); any
 value lower than this limit will be ignored and the old configuration will be
 retained.
+Note: the value of dirty_bytes also cannot be set lower than
+dirty_background_bytes or the amount of memory corresponding to
+dirty_background_ratio.
I think this means that a script which alters both dirty_bytes and
dirty_background_bytes must alter dirty_background_bytes first if they
are being decreased and must alter dirty_bytes first if they are being
increased.  Or something like that.

And existing scripts which do not do this will cease to work correctly,
no?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help