Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: introduce simple gemfs
From: Chris Wilson <hidden>
Date: 2017-09-25 18:06:31
Also in:
intel-gfx
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2017-10-06 · [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: introduce simple gemfs · Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
- 2017-10-05 · [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: introduce simple gemfs · Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
- 2017-10-02 · Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: introduce simple gemfs · Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
- 2017-09-29 · [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: introduce simple gemfs · Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
- 2017-07-25 · [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: introduce simple gemfs · Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Quoting Matthew Auld (2017-09-22 18:32:33)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -4914,6 +4938,8 @@ i915_gem_load_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->fb_tracking.lock); + WARN_ON(i915_gemfs_init(dev_priv));
Make this kinder, the driver will happily continue without a special
gemfs mounting. (For mock, maybe WARN and bail for the tests that need gemfs?)
if (i915_gemfs_init(dev_priv)))
DRM_NOTE("Unable to create a private tmpfs mountpoint, hugepage support will be disabled.\n");
-Chris
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>