Re: [PATCH] mm, memory_hotplug: do not back off draining pcp free pages from kworker context
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: 2017-08-29 11:22:02
Also in:
lkml
On 2017/08/29 7:33, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:33:41 +0200 Michal Hocko [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
drain_all_pages backs off when called from a kworker context since 0ccce3b924212 ("mm, page_alloc: drain per-cpu pages from workqueue context") because the original IPI based pcp draining has been replaced by a WQ based one and the check wanted to prevent from recursion and inter workers dependencies. This has made some sense at the time because the system WQ has been used and one worker holding the lock could be blocked while waiting for new workers to emerge which can be a problem under OOM conditions. Since then ce612879ddc7 ("mm: move pcp and lru-pcp draining into single wq") has moved draining to a dedicated (mm_percpu_wq) WQ with a rescuer so we shouldn't depend on any other WQ activity to make a forward progress so calling drain_all_pages from a worker context is safe as long as this doesn't happen from mm_percpu_wq itself which is not the case because all workers are required to _not_ depend on any MM locks. Why is this a problem in the first place? ACPI driven memory hot-remove (acpi_device_hotplug) is executed from the worker context. We end up calling __offline_pages to free all the pages and that requires both lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked and drain_all_pages to do their job otherwise we can have dangling pages on pcp lists and fail the offline operation (__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock would see a page with 0 ref. count but without PageBuddy set). Fix the issue by removing the worker check in drain_all_pages. lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked doesn't have this restriction so it works as expected. Fixes: 0ccce3b924212 ("mm, page_alloc: drain per-cpu pages from workqueue context") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>No cc:stable?
Michal, are you sure that this patch does not cause deadlock? As shown in "[PATCH] mm: Use WQ_HIGHPRI for mm_percpu_wq." thread, currently work items on mm_percpu_wq seem to be blocked by other work items not on mm_percpu_wq. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>