Re: [PATCH 0/3] Reduce amount of time kswapd sleeps prematurely
From: Mel Gorman <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-15 22:15:36
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:56:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:29:06 +0000 Mel Gorman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:30:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 09:22:44 +0000 Mel Gorman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This patchset is based on mmots as of Feb 9th, 2016. The baseline is important as there are a number of kswapd-related fixes in that tree and a comparison against v4.10-rc7 would be almost meaningless as a result.It's very late to squeeze this into 4.10. We can make it 4.11 material and perhaps tag it for backporting into 4.10.1?It would be important that Johannes's patches go along with then because I'm relied on Johannes' fixes to deal with pages being inappropriately written back from reclaim context when I was analysing the workload. I'm thinking specifically about these patches mm-vmscan-scan-dirty-pages-even-in-laptop-mode.patch mm-vmscan-kick-flushers-when-we-encounter-dirty-pages-on-the-lru.patch mm-vmscan-kick-flushers-when-we-encounter-dirty-pages-on-the-lru-fix.patch mm-vmscan-remove-old-flusher-wakeup-from-direct-reclaim-path.patch mm-vmscan-only-write-dirty-pages-that-the-scanner-has-seen-twice.patch mm-vmscan-move-dirty-pages-out-of-the-way-until-theyre-flushed.patch mm-vmscan-move-dirty-pages-out-of-the-way-until-theyre-flushed-fix.patch This is 4.11 material for sure but I would not automatically try merging them to 4.10 unless those patches were also included, ideally with a rerun of just those patches against 4.10 to make sure there are no surprises lurking in there.Head spinning a bit. You're saying that if the three patches in the series "Reduce amount of time kswapd sleeps prematurely" are held off until 4.11 then the above 6 patches from Johannes should also be held off for 4.11?
Not quite, sorry for the confusion. Johannes's patches stand on their own and they are fine. I evaluated them before against 4.10-rcX and they worked as expected. If they go in first then these patches can go into 4.10-stable on top. If you plan to merge Johannes's patches for 4.10 or 4.10.1 then I have no problem with that whatsoever. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>