Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: Enable Buddy allocation isolation for CDM nodes
From: Vlastimil Babka <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-09 08:48:26
Also in:
lkml
On 02/09/2017 06:05 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 02/08/2017 10:48 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:quoted
On 02/08/2017 03:01 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:quoted
This implements allocation isolation for CDM nodes in buddy allocator by discarding CDM memory zones all the time except in the cases where the gfp flag has got __GFP_THISNODE or the nodemask contains CDM nodes in cases where it is non NULL (explicit allocation request in the kernel or user process MPOL_BIND policy based requests). Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <redacted> --- mm/page_alloc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 40908de..7d8c82a 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ #include <linux/page_owner.h> #include <linux/kthread.h> #include <linux/memcontrol.h> +#include <linux/node.h> #include <asm/sections.h> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>@@ -2908,6 +2909,24 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsignedint order, int alloc_flags, struct page *page; unsigned long mark; + /* + * CDM nodes get skipped if the requested gfp flag + * does not have __GFP_THISNODE set or the nodemask + * does not have any CDM nodes in case the nodemask + * is non NULL (explicit allocation requests from + * kernel or user process MPOL_BIND policy which has + * CDM nodes). + */ + if (is_cdm_node(zone->zone_pgdat->node_id)) { + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE)) { + if (!ac->nodemask) + continue; + + if (!nodemask_has_cdm(*ac->nodemask)) + continue;nodemask_has_cdm() looks quite expensive, combined with the loop here that's O(n^2). But I don't understand why you need it. If there is no cdm node in the nodemask, then we never reach this code with a cdm node, because the zonelist iterator already checks the nodemask? Am I missing something?A CDM zone can be selected during zonelist iteration if (1) If nodemask is NULL (where all zones are eligible) (1) Skip it if __GFP_THISNODE is not mentioned (2) Pick it if __GFP_THISNODE is mentioned (2) If nodemask has CDM (where CDM zones are eligible) (1) Pick it if nodemask has CDM (2) Pick it if __GFP_THISNODE is mentioned (1) (1) Enforces the primary isolation (2) (1) Is the only option which could be O(n^2) as the worst case Checking for both the zone being a CDM zone and the nodemask containing CDM node has to happen together for (2) (1). But we dont run into this option unless we have first checked if request contains __GFP_THISNODE and that nodemask is really a non NULL value. Hence the number cases getting into (2) (1) should be less. IIUC only the user space MPOL_BIND ones will come here.
Maybe I'm still missing something, but when you do nodemask_has_cdm() above then we already passed "if (!ac->nodemask) continue" which means ac->nodemask is not null, which means the zonelist iterator already did the filtering on ac->nodemask, and if this zone passed the filter and it's a cdm zone, then it has to be set in the nodemask? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>