Re: drm/radeon spamming alloc_contig_range: [xxx, yyy) PFNs busy busy
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-12-01 14:11:30
Also in:
dri-devel, lkml
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-12-01 14:11:30
Also in:
dri-devel, lkml
Let's also CC Marek On Thu 01-12-16 08:43:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 12/01/2016 08:21 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
Forgot to CC Joonsoo. The email thread starts more or less here http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161130092239.GD18437@dhcp22.suse.cz On Thu 01-12-16 08:15:07, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
On Wed 30-11-16 20:19:03, Robin H. Johnson wrote: [...]quoted
alloc_contig_range: [83f2a3, 83f2a4) PFNs busyHuh, do I get it right that the request was for a _single_ page? Why do we need CMA for that?Ugh, good point. I assumed that was just the PFNs that it failed to migrate away, but it seems that's indeed the whole requested range. Yeah sounds some part of the dma-cma chain could be smarter and attempt CMA only for e.g. costly orders.
Is there any reason why the DMA api doesn't try the page allocator first before falling back to the CMA? I simply have a hard time to see why the CMA should be used (and fragment) for small requests size. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>