Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/vmalloc.c: correct lazy_max_pages() return value
From: zijun_hu <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-22 01:15:03
Also in:
lkml
On 09/22/2016 08:35 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016, zijun_hu wrote:quoted
On 2016/9/22 5:21, David Rientjes wrote:quoted
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, zijun_hu wrote:quoted
From: zijun_hu <redacted> correct lazy_max_pages() return value if the number of online CPUs is power of 2 Signed-off-by: zijun_hu <redacted> --- mm/vmalloc.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index a125ae8..2804224 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c@@ -594,7 +594,9 @@ static unsigned long lazy_max_pages(void) { unsigned int log; - log = fls(num_online_cpus()); + log = num_online_cpus(); + if (log > 1) + log = (unsigned int)get_count_order(log); return log * (32UL * 1024 * 1024 / PAGE_SIZE); }The implementation of lazy_max_pages() is somewhat arbitrarily defined, the existing approximation has been around for eight years and num_online_cpus() isn't intended to be rounded up to the next power of 2. I'd be inclined to just leave it as it is.do i understand the intent in current code logic as below ? [8, 15) roundup to 16? [32, 63) roundup to 64?The intent is as it is implemented; with your change, lazy_max_pages() is potentially increased depending on the number of online cpus. This is only a heuristic, changing it would need justification on why the new value is better. It is opposite to what the comment says: "to be conservative and not introduce a big latency on huge systems, so go with a less aggressive log scale." NACK to the patch.
my change potentially make lazy_max_pages() decreased not increased, i seems
conform with the comment
if the number of online CPUs is not power of 2, both have no any difference
otherwise, my change remain power of 2 value, and the original code rounds up
to next power of 2 value, for instance
my change : (32, 64] -> 64
32 -> 32, 64 -> 64
the original code: [32, 63) -> 64
32 -> 64, 64 -> 128
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>