Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 7 authors, 2016-09-26

Re: [PATCH 0/1] memory offline issues with hugepage size > memory block size

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2016-09-21 18:27:51
Also in: lkml

On 09/21/2016 11:20 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
I would even question the per page block offlining itself. Why would
anybody want to offline few blocks rather than the whole node? What is
the usecase here?
The original reason was so that you could remove a DIMM or a riser card
full of DIMMs, which are certainly a subset of a node.

With virtual machines, perhaps you only want to make a small adjustment
to the memory that a VM has.  Or, perhaps the VM only _has_ one node.
Granted, ballooning takes care of a lot of these cases, but memmap[]
starts to get annoying at some point if you balloon too much memory away.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help