Re: [kernel-hardening] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2016-09-14 09:49:26
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:36:34AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Juerg Haefliger wrote:quoted
This patch series adds support for XPFO which protects against 'ret2dir' kernel attacks. The basic idea is to enforce exclusive ownership of page frames by either the kernel or userspace, unless explicitly requested by the kernel. Whenever a page destined for userspace is allocated, it is unmapped from physmap (the kernel's page table). When such a page is reclaimed from userspace, it is mapped back to physmap.
quoted
Reference paper by the original patch authors: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~vpk/papers/ret2dir.sec14.pdf
For both arm64 and x86_64, DEBUG_RODATA is mandatory (or soon to be so). Assuming that implies a lack of execute permission for x86_64, that should provide a similar level of protection against erroneously branching to addresses in the linear map, without the complexity and overhead of mapping/unmapping pages. So to me it looks like this approach may only be useful for architectures without page-granular execute permission controls. Is this also intended to protect against erroneous *data* accesses to the linear map?
Now that I read the paper more carefully, I can see that this is the case, and this does catch issues which DEBUG_RODATA cannot. Apologies for the noise. Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>