[PATCH v3 01/15] x86/dumpstack: Optimize save_stack_trace
From: Byungchul Park <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-13 09:50:44
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
the rest, x86 architecture (32-bit and 64-bit), x86 stack unwinding · Maintainers:
Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, Josh Poimboeuf, Peter Zijlstra
Currently, x86 implementation of save_stack_trace() is walking all stack region word by word regardless of what the trace->max_entries is. However, it's unnecessary to walk after already fulfilling caller's requirement, say, if trace->nr_entries >= trace->max_entries is true. I measured its overhead and printed its difference of sched_clock() with my QEMU x86 machine. The latency was improved over 70% when trace->max_entries = 5. Before this patch: [ 2.329573] save_stack_trace() takes 76820 ns [ 2.329863] save_stack_trace() takes 62131 ns [ 2.330000] save_stack_trace() takes 99476 ns [ 2.329846] save_stack_trace() takes 62419 ns [ 2.330000] save_stack_trace() takes 88918 ns [ 2.330253] save_stack_trace() takes 73669 ns [ 2.330520] save_stack_trace() takes 67876 ns [ 2.330671] save_stack_trace() takes 75963 ns [ 2.330983] save_stack_trace() takes 95079 ns [ 2.330451] save_stack_trace() takes 62352 ns After this patch: [ 2.795000] save_stack_trace() takes 21147 ns [ 2.795397] save_stack_trace() takes 20230 ns [ 2.795397] save_stack_trace() takes 31274 ns [ 2.795739] save_stack_trace() takes 19706 ns [ 2.796484] save_stack_trace() takes 20266 ns [ 2.796484] save_stack_trace() takes 20902 ns [ 2.797000] save_stack_trace() takes 38110 ns [ 2.797510] save_stack_trace() takes 20224 ns [ 2.798181] save_stack_trace() takes 20172 ns [ 2.798837] save_stack_trace() takes 20824 ns Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <redacted> --- arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 4 ++++ arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c | 7 +++++++ 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 0944218..f6d0694 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct stacktrace_ops { /* On negative return stop dumping */ int (*stack)(void *data, char *name); walk_stack_t walk_stack; + int (*end_walk)(void *data); }; void dump_trace(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index ef8017c..274d42a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ print_context_stack(struct task_struct *task, print_ftrace_graph_addr(addr, data, ops, task, graph); } stack++; + if (ops->end_walk && ops->end_walk(data)) + break; } return bp; }
@@ -138,6 +140,8 @@ print_context_stack_bp(struct task_struct *task, frame = frame->next_frame; ret_addr = &frame->return_address; print_ftrace_graph_addr(addr, data, ops, task, graph); + if (ops->end_walk && ops->end_walk(data)) + break; } return (unsigned long)frame;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
index fef917e..762d1fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, bp = ops->walk_stack(task, stack, bp, ops, data, end_stack, &graph); + if (ops->end_walk && ops->end_walk(data)) + break; /* Stop if not on irq stack */ if (!end_stack)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 9ee98ee..a44de4d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c@@ -47,10 +47,17 @@ save_stack_address_nosched(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable) return __save_stack_address(data, addr, reliable, true); } +static int save_stack_end(void *data) +{ + struct stack_trace *trace = data; + return trace->nr_entries >= trace->max_entries; +} + static const struct stacktrace_ops save_stack_ops = { .stack = save_stack_stack, .address = save_stack_address, .walk_stack = print_context_stack, + .end_walk = save_stack_end, }; static const struct stacktrace_ops save_stack_ops_nosched = {
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>