Re: [PATCH v1] mm, sysctl: Add sysctl for controlling VM_MAYEXEC taint
From: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Date: 2016-08-29 15:25:23
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:30:04PM -0400, robert.foss@collabora.com wrote:quoted
From: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org> This patch proposes a sysctl knob that allows a privileged user to disable ~VM_MAYEXEC tainting when mapping in a vma from a MNT_NOEXEC mountpoint. It does not alter the normal behavior resulting from attempting to directly mmap(PROT_EXEC) a vma (-EPERM) nor the behavior of any other subsystems checking MNT_NOEXEC.Wouldn't it be equal to remounting all filesystems without noexec from attacker POV? It's hardly a fence to make additional mprotect(PROT_EXEC) call, before starting executing code from such filesystems. If administrator of the system wants this, he can just mount filesystem without noexec, no new kernel code required. And it's more fine-grained than this. So, no, I don't think we should add knob like this. Unless I miss something.
I don't believe this patch is necessary anymore (though, thank you Robert for testing and re-sending!). The primary offenders wrt to needing to mmap/mprotect a file in /dev/shm was the older nvidia driver (binary only iirc) and the Chrome Native Client code. The reason why half-exec is an "ok" (half) mitigation is because it blocks simple gadgets and other paths for using loadable libraries or binaries (via glibc) as it disallows mmap(PROT_EXEC) even though it allows mprotect(PROT_EXEC). This stops ld in its tracks since it does the obvious thing and uses mmap(PROT_EXEC). I think time has marched on and this patch is now something I can toss in the dustbin of history. Both Chrome's Native Client and an older nvidia driver relied on creating-then-unlinking a file in tmpfs, but there is now a better facility!
NAK.
Agreed - this is old and software that predicated it should be gone.. I hope. :)
quoted
It is motivated by a common /dev/shm, /tmp usecase. There are few facilities for creating a shared memory segment that can be remapped in the same process address space with different permissions.What about using memfd_create(2) for such cases? You'll get a file descriptor from in-kernel tmpfs (shm_mnt) which is not exposed to userspace for remount as noexec.
This is a relatively old patch ( https://lwn.net/Articles/455256/ ) which predated memfd_create(). memfd_create() is the right solution to this problem! Thanks again! will