Re: [PATCH] mm, oom: report compaction/migration stats for higher order requests
From: Vlastimil Babka <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-19 06:44:10
Also in:
linux-ext4
On 08/18/2016 08:49 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Wednesday 17 of August 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
On Wed 17-08-16 10:34:54, Arkadiusz MiA?kiewicz wrote: [...]quoted
With "[PATCH] mm, oom: report compaction/migration stats for higher order requests" patch: https://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/p2/ext4/log-20160817.txt Didn't count much - all counters are 0 compaction_stall:0 compaction_fail:0 compact_migrate_scanned:0 compact_free_scanned:0 compact_isolated:0 pgmigrate_success:0 pgmigrate_fail:0Dohh, COMPACTION counters are events and those are different than other counters we have. They only have per-cpu representation and so we would have to do + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { + struct vm_event_state *this = &per_cpu(vm_event_states, cpu); + ret += this->event[item]; + } which is really nasty because, strictly speaking, we would have to do {get,put}_online_cpus around that loop and that uses locking and we do not want to possibly block in this path just because something is in the middle of the hotplug. So let's scratch that patch for now and sorry I haven't realized that earlier.quoted
two processes were killed by OOM (rm and cp), the rest of rm/cp didn't finish and I'm interrupting it to try that next patch:quoted
Could you try to test with patch from http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160816031222.GC16913@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE please? Ideally on top of linux-next. You can add both the compaction counters patch in the oom report and high order atomic reserves patch on top.Uhm, was going to use it on top of 4.7.[01] first.OKSo with http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160816031222.GC16913@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE OOM no longer happens (all 10x rm/cp processes finished).
Is it on top of 4.7 then? That's a bit different from the other reporter who needed both linux-next and this patch to avoid OOM. In any case the proper solution should restrict this disabled heuristic to highest compaction priority, which needs the patches from linux-next anyway. So can you please also try linux-next with the patch from http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=147158805719821 ? Thanks!
https://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/p2/ext4/log-20160818.txt On Wednesday 17 of August 2016, Jan Kara wrote:quoted
Just one more debug idea to add on top of what Michal said: Can you enable mm_shrink_slab_start and mm_shrink_slab_end tracepoints (via /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/vmscan/mm_shrink_slab_{start,end}/enable) and gather output from /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe while the copy is running?Here it is: https://ixion.pld-linux.org/~arekm/p2/ext4/log-trace_pipe-20160818.txt.gz
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>