Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-12

Re: kmemleak: Cannot insert 0xff7f1000 into the object search tree (overlaps existing)

From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Date: 2016-08-12 10:40:37
Also in: linux-omap, lkml


On Friday 12 August 2016 03:34 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 09:45:05AM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:
quoted
On Thursday 11 August 2016 10:38 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
[...]
From b8b9141fffc1fd3c73583c1fd50a724c4a6452e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:43:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm: kmemleak: Avoid using __va() on addresses that don't have
 a lowmem mapping

Some of the kmemleak_*() callbacks in memblock, bootmem, CMA convert a
physical address to a virtual one using __va(). However, such physical
addresses may sometimes be located in highmem and using __va() is
incorrect, leading to inconsistent object tracking in kmemleak.

The following functions have been added to the kmemleak API and they
take a physical address as the object pointer. They only perform the
corresponding action if the address has a lowmem mapping:

kmemleak_alloc_phys
kmemleak_free_part_phys
kmemleak_not_leak_phys
kmemleak_ignore_phys

The affected calling placess have been updated to use the new kmemleak
API.

Reported-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Thanks, this solves the issue!
I tested on AM335x GP EVM and DRA72 EVM on linux-next with below patch
applied. FWIW,
Tested-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>

I can see this issue on stable v4.4.17 kernel as well. So, can this
patch be marked for stable backport?


Regards
Vignesh
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 Documentation/kmemleak.txt |  9 +++++++++
 include/linux/kmemleak.h   | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/bootmem.c               |  6 +++---
 mm/cma.c                   |  2 +-
 mm/memblock.c              |  8 ++++----
 mm/nobootmem.c             |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/kmemleak.txt b/Documentation/kmemleak.txt
index 18e24abb3ecf..35e1a8891e3a 100644
--- a/Documentation/kmemleak.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kmemleak.txt
@@ -155,6 +155,15 @@ kmemleak_erase		 - erase an old value in a pointer variable
 kmemleak_alloc_recursive - as kmemleak_alloc but checks the recursiveness
 kmemleak_free_recursive	 - as kmemleak_free but checks the recursiveness
 
+The following functions take a physical address as the object pointer
+and only perform the corresponding action if the address has a lowmem
+mapping:
+
+kmemleak_alloc_phys
+kmemleak_free_part_phys
+kmemleak_not_leak_phys
+kmemleak_ignore_phys
+
 Dealing with false positives/negatives
 --------------------------------------
 
diff --git a/include/linux/kmemleak.h b/include/linux/kmemleak.h
index 4894c6888bc6..380f72bc3657 100644
--- a/include/linux/kmemleak.h
+++ b/include/linux/kmemleak.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #ifndef __KMEMLEAK_H
 #define __KMEMLEAK_H
 
+#include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
@@ -109,4 +110,29 @@ static inline void kmemleak_no_scan(const void *ptr)
 
 #endif	/* CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK */
 
+static inline void kmemleak_alloc_phys(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
+				       int min_count, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || phys < __pa(high_memory))
+		kmemleak_alloc(__va(phys), size, min_count, gfp);
+}
+
+static inline void kmemleak_free_part_phys(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
+{
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || phys < __pa(high_memory))
+		kmemleak_free_part(__va(phys), size);
+}
+
+static inline void kmemleak_not_leak_phys(phys_addr_t phys)
+{
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || phys < __pa(high_memory))
+		kmemleak_not_leak(__va(phys));
+}
+
+static inline void kmemleak_ignore_phys(phys_addr_t phys)
+{
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || phys < __pa(high_memory))
+		kmemleak_ignore(__va(phys));
+}
+
 #endif	/* __KMEMLEAK_H */
diff --git a/mm/bootmem.c b/mm/bootmem.c
index 0aa7dda52402..80f1d70bad2d 100644
--- a/mm/bootmem.c
+++ b/mm/bootmem.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ void __init free_bootmem_late(unsigned long physaddr, unsigned long size)
 {
 	unsigned long cursor, end;
 
-	kmemleak_free_part(__va(physaddr), size);
+	kmemleak_free_part_phys(physaddr, size);
 
 	cursor = PFN_UP(physaddr);
 	end = PFN_DOWN(physaddr + size);
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ void __init free_bootmem_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, unsigned long physaddr,
 {
 	unsigned long start, end;
 
-	kmemleak_free_part(__va(physaddr), size);
+	kmemleak_free_part_phys(physaddr, size);
 
 	start = PFN_UP(physaddr);
 	end = PFN_DOWN(physaddr + size);
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ void __init free_bootmem(unsigned long physaddr, unsigned long size)
 {
 	unsigned long start, end;
 
-	kmemleak_free_part(__va(physaddr), size);
+	kmemleak_free_part_phys(physaddr, size);
 
 	start = PFN_UP(physaddr);
 	end = PFN_DOWN(physaddr + size);
diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
index bd0e1412475e..384c2cb51b56 100644
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
 		 * kmemleak scans/reads tracked objects for pointers to other
 		 * objects but this address isn't mapped and accessible
 		 */
-		kmemleak_ignore(phys_to_virt(addr));
+		kmemleak_ignore_phys(addr);
 		base = addr;
 	}
 
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 483197ef613f..30ecea7b45d1 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 		     (unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
 		     (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
-	kmemleak_free_part(__va(base), size);
+	kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
 	return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
 }
 
@@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size,
 		 * The min_count is set to 0 so that memblock allocations are
 		 * never reported as leaks.
 		 */
-		kmemleak_alloc(__va(found), size, 0, 0);
+		kmemleak_alloc_phys(found, size, 0, 0);
 		return found;
 	}
 	return 0;
@@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ void __init __memblock_free_early(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 	memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pF\n",
 		     __func__, (u64)base, (u64)base + size - 1,
 		     (void *)_RET_IP_);
-	kmemleak_free_part(__va(base), size);
+	kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
 	memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
 }
 
@@ -1419,7 +1419,7 @@ void __init __memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 	memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pF\n",
 		     __func__, (u64)base, (u64)base + size - 1,
 		     (void *)_RET_IP_);
-	kmemleak_free_part(__va(base), size);
+	kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
 	cursor = PFN_UP(base);
 	end = PFN_DOWN(base + size);
 
diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
index bd05a70f44b9..a056d31dff7e 100644
--- a/mm/nobootmem.c
+++ b/mm/nobootmem.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ void __init free_bootmem_late(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
 	unsigned long cursor, end;
 
-	kmemleak_free_part(__va(addr), size);
+	kmemleak_free_part_phys(addr, size);
 
 	cursor = PFN_UP(addr);
 	end = PFN_DOWN(addr + size);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help