Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-01

Re: [RFC] mm: bail out in shrin_inactive_list

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2016-07-26 07:46:57
Also in: lkml

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:21:57AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
quoted
quoted
I believe proper fix is to modify get_scan_count. IOW, I think
we should introduce lruvec_reclaimable_lru_size with proper
classzone_idx but I don't know how we can fix it with memcg
which doesn't have zone stat now. should introduce zone stat
back to memcg? Or, it's okay to ignore memcg?
I think it's ok to ignore memcg in this case as a memcg shrink is often
going to be for pages that can use highmem anyway.
So, you mean it's okay to ignore kmemcg case?
If memcg guys agree it, I want to make get_scan_count consider
reclaimable lru size under the reclaim constraint, instead.
For now, I believe yet. My understanding is that the primary use cases
for kmemcg is systems running large numbers of containers. It consider
it extremely unlikely that large 32-bit systems are being used for large
numbers of containers and require usage of kmemcg.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help