On 07/22/2016 09:44 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:26:19 +0200 Vlastimil Babka [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 07/22/2016 08:37 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:

quoted

On Thu 21-07-16 16:53:09, Michal Hocko wrote:

quoted

From d64815758c212643cc1750774e2751721685059a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:40:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm, mempool: only set __GFP_NOMEMALLOC if there are
 free elements"

This reverts commit f9054c70d28bc214b2857cf8db8269f4f45a5e23.

I've noticed that Andrew has already picked this one up. Is anybody
against marking it for stable?

It would be strange to have different behavior with known regression in 
4.6 and 4.7 stables. Actually, there's still time for 4.7 proper?

I added the cc:stable.

Do we need to bust a gut to rush it into 4.7?  It sounds safer to let
it bake for a while, fix it in 4.7.1?

Yeah, I guess it's safer to wait now. Would be different if the reverted
commit went in the same cycle.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>