Re: [PATCH rebase] mm: fix vm-scalability regression in cgroup-aware workingset code
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-06-27 13:05:35
Also in:
cgroups, lkml
[Sorry for a late reply] On Fri 24-06-16 13:51:01, Johannes Weiner wrote:
This is a rebased version on top of mmots sans the nodelru stuff.
---
23047a96d7cf ("mm: workingset: per-cgroup cache thrash detection")
added a page->mem_cgroup lookup to the cache eviction, refault, and
activation paths, as well as locking to the activation path, and the
vm-scalability tests showed a regression of -23%. While the test in
question is an artificial worst-case scenario that doesn't occur in
real workloads - reading two sparse files in parallel at full CPU
speed just to hammer the LRU paths - there is still some optimizations
that can be done in those paths.
Inline the lookup functions to eliminate calls. Also, page->mem_cgroup
doesn't need to be stabilized when counting an activation; we merely
need to hold the RCU lock to prevent the memcg from being freed.
This cuts down on overhead quite a bit:
23047a96d7cfcfca 063f6715e77a7be5770d6081fe
---------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
21621405 +- 0% +11.3% 24069657 +- 2% vm-scalability.throughput
Reported-by: Ye Xiaolong <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Minor note below
+static inline struct mem_cgroup *page_memcg_rcu(struct page *page)
+{I guess rcu_read_lock_held() here would be appropriate
+ return READ_ONCE(page->mem_cgroup); +}
-- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>