Re: Boot failure on emev2/kzm9d (was: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] mm/slab: lockless decision to grow cache)
From: Paul E. McKenney <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-22 19:09:09
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 05:01:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Joonsoo Kim [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Could you try below patch to check who causes the hang? And, if sysalt-t works when hang, could you get sysalt-t output? I haven't used it before but Paul could find some culprit on it. :) Thanks. ----->8-----diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index 763096a..9652d38 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c@@ -964,8 +964,13 @@ static int setup_kmem_cache_node(struct kmem_cache *cachep, * guaranteed to be valid until irq is re-enabled, because it will be * freed after synchronize_sched(). */ - if (force_change) + if (force_change) { + if (num_online_cpus() > 1) + dump_stack(); synchronize_sched(); + if (num_online_cpus() > 1) + dump_stack(); + }I've only added the first one, as I would never see the second one. All of this happens before the serial console is activated, earlycon is not supported, and I only have remote access. Brought up 2 CPUs SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (2132.00 BogoMIPS). CPU: All CPU(s) started in SVC mode. CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.7.0-rc4-kzm9d-00404-g4a235e6dde4404dd-dirty #89 Hardware name: Generic Emma Mobile EV2 (Flattened Device Tree) [<c010de68>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010a658>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010a658>] (show_stack) from [<c02b5cf8>] (dump_stack+0x7c/0x9c) [<c02b5cf8>] (dump_stack) from [<c01cfa4c>] (setup_kmem_cache_node+0x140/0x170) [<c01cfa4c>] (setup_kmem_cache_node) from [<c01cfe3c>] (__do_tune_cpucache+0xf4/0x114) [<c01cfe3c>] (__do_tune_cpucache) from [<c01cff54>] (enable_cpucache+0xf8/0x148) [<c01cff54>] (enable_cpucache) from [<c01d0190>] (__kmem_cache_create+0x1a8/0x1d0) [<c01d0190>] (__kmem_cache_create) from [<c01b32d0>] (kmem_cache_create+0xbc/0x190) [<c01b32d0>] (kmem_cache_create) from [<c070d968>] (shmem_init+0x34/0xb0) [<c070d968>] (shmem_init) from [<c0700cc8>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x98/0x1ec) [<c0700cc8>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c049fdbc>] (kernel_init+0x8/0x110) [<c049fdbc>] (kernel_init) from [<c0106cb8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x3c) devtmpfs: initialized
I don't see anything here that would prevent grace periods from completing. The CPUs are using the normal hotplug sequence to come online, correct? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>