Re: [PATCH 04/13] mm: Track NR_KERNEL_STACK in pages instead of number of stacks
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: 2016-06-16 17:40:06
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Josh Poimboeuf [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 05:28:26PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:quoted
Currently, NR_KERNEL_STACK tracks the number of kernel stacks in a zone. This only makes sense if each kernel stack exists entirely in one zone, and allowing vmapped stacks could break this assumption. It turns out that the code for tracking kernel stack allocations in units of pages is slightly simpler, so just switch to counting pages. Cc: Vladimir Davydov <redacted> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> --- fs/proc/meminfo.c | 2 +- kernel/fork.c | 3 ++- mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +-- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)You missed another usage of NR_KERNEL_STACK in drivers/base/node.c.
Thanks. The real reason I cc'd you was so you could look at rewind_stack_do_exit and the sneaky trick I did in no_context in the last patch, though. :) Both survive objtool, but I figured I'd check with objtool's author as well. If there was a taint bit I could set saying "kernel is hosed -- don't try to apply live patches any more", I'd have extra confidence. --Andy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>