On Mon, 2 May 2016 20:03:07 +0200
Andrea Arcangeli [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:00:42PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:

quoted

Agreed. I just didn't see the two-refcounts solution.  

If you didn't do it already or if you're busy with something else,
I can change the patch to the two refcount solution, which should
restore the old semantics without breaking rmap.

I didn't see any follow-up beyond this nor patches on lkml.  Do we have
something we feel confident for posting to v4.6 with a stable backport
to v4.5?  Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>