On 2/25/16 23:12, Jiri Kosina wrote:

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Chen Gang wrote:

quoted

I can understand for your NAK, it is a trivial patch. 

Not all trivial patches are NAKed :) But they have to be generally useful.

Shuffling code around, without actually changing / improving it a bit, 
just for the sole purpose of formatting, is kind of pointless (especially 
given the fact that the current code as-is is easily readable; it's not 
like it'd be a horrible mess difficult to understand).

Sure, it might had been formatted better at the time it was actually 
merged. But changing it "just because" after being in tree for long time 
doesn't fix any problem really.

OK, thanks. I have replied the related contents in the other thread.

Welcome any ideas, suggestions, and completions in the other related
thread.

Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang (e??a??)

Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>