Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: introduce page reference manipulation functions
From: Joonsoo Kim <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-25 00:33:43
Also in:
linux-api, lkml
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:32:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:21:17 +0900 js1304@gmail.com wrote:quoted
From: Joonsoo Kim <redacted> Success of CMA allocation largely depends on success of migration and key factor of it is page reference count. Until now, page reference is manipulated by direct calling atomic functions so we cannot follow up who and where manipulate it. Then, it is hard to find actual reason of CMA allocation failure. CMA allocation should be guaranteed to succeed so finding offending place is really important. In this patch, call sites where page reference is manipulated are converted to introduced wrapper function. This is preparation step to add tracepoint to each page reference manipulation function. With this facility, we can easily find reason of CMA allocation failure. There is no functional change in this patch. ...--- a/arch/mips/mm/gup.c +++ b/arch/mips/mm/gup.c@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static inline void get_head_page_multiple(struct page *page, int nr) { VM_BUG_ON(page != compound_head(page)); VM_BUG_ON(page_count(page) == 0); - atomic_add(nr, &page->_count); + page_ref_add(page, nr);Seems reasonable. Those open-coded refcount manipulations have always bugged me.
I think so.
The patches will be a bit of a pain to maintain but surprisingly they apply OK at present. It's possible that by the time they hit upstream, some direct ->_count references will still be present and it will require a second pass to complete the conversion.
In fact, the patch doesn't change direct ->_count reference for *read*. That's the reason that it is surprisingly OK at present. It's a good idea to change direct ->_count reference even for read. How about changing it in rc2 after mering this patch in rc1?
After that pass is completed I suggest we rename page._count to something else (page.ref_count_dont_use_this_directly_you_dope?). That way, any attempts to later add direct page._count references will hopefully break, alerting the programmer to the new regime.
Agreed. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>