Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 3 authors, 2016-02-16

Re: [PATCH V3] powerpc/mm: Fix Multi hit ERAT cause by recent THP update

From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-02-16 05:20:27
Also in: linuxppc-dev, lkml

On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 16:31 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Balbir Singh [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
Now we can't depend for mm_cpumask, a parallel find_linux_pte_hugepte
can happen outside that. Now i had a variant for kick_all_cpus_sync that
ignored idle cpus. But then that needs more verification.

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/81105
Can be racy as a CPU moves from non-idle to idle

In
quoted
+A A A A A pmd_hugepage_update(vma->vm_mm, address, pmdp, ~0UL, 0);
+A A A A A /*
+A A A A A A * This ensures that generic code that rely on IRQ disabling
+A A A A A A * to prevent a parallel THP split work as expected.
+A A A A A A */
+A A A A A kick_all_cpus_sync();
pmdp_invalidate()->pmd_hugepage_update() can still run in parallel withA 
find_linux_pte_or_hugepte() and race.. Am I missing something?
Yes. But then we make sure that the pte_t returned by
find_linux_pte_or_hugepte doesn't change to a regular pmd entry by using
that kick. Now callers of find_lnux_pte_or_hugepte will check for
_PAGE_PRESENT. So if it called before
pmd_hugepage_update(_PAGE_PRESENT), we wait for the caller to finish the
usage (via kick()). Or they bail out after finding _PAGE_PRESENT cleared.
Makes sense, but I would still check the assumption about checking for
_PAGE_PRESENT

Balbir Singh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help