On 01/27/2016 01:59 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:36:11PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:

quoted

If we can convert existing users that only check for 
CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC to rather check for debug_pagealloc_enabled() and 
agree that it is only enabled for debug_pagealloc=on, then this would seem 
fine.  However, I think we should at least consult with those users before 
removing an artifact from the kernel log that could be useful in debugging 
why a particular BUG() happened.

Yes, at least, non-architecture dependent code (vmalloc, SLAB, SLUB) should
be changed first. If Christian doesn't mind, I will try to fix above 3
things.

I think it might be worth also to convert debug_pagealloc_enabled() to be based
on static key, like I did for page_owner [1]. That should help make it possible
to have virtually no overhead when compiling kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
without enabling it boot-time. I assume it's one of the goals here?

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg100795.html

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>