Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] mm, oom: print symbolic gfp_flags in oom warning
From: Vlastimil Babka <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-08 11:34:35
Also in:
lkml
On 01/07/2016 10:29 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote:quoted
It would be useful to translate gfp_flags into string representation when printing in case of an OOM, especially as the flags have been undergoing some changes recently and the script ./scripts/gfp-translate needs a matching source version to be accurate. Example output: a.out invoked oom-killer: order=0, oom_score_adj=0, gfp_mask=0x24280ca(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE|GFP_ZERO)Is there a way that we can keep the order of the fields so that anything parsing the kernel log for oom kills doesn't break?
Yes, this is possible with the new printk handling of flags, please look at v3: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=145042944710510&w=2 There I changed the print just to have order first and gfp_mask next, as it seemed more logical. But it doesn't need to be that way and I can post V4 keeping the original order of variables. But do you think the flags expansion is safe to add there, or should I put it on separate line? Thanks
The messages printed to the kernel log are the only (current) way to determine that the kernel killed something so we should be careful not to break anything parsing them, and this is a common line to look for.
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>