Re: [PATCH 1/2] zpool: define and use max type length
From: Dan Streetman <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-19 02:20:45
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:06:00 -0400 Dan Streetman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add ZPOOL_MAX_TYPE_NAME define, and change zpool_driver *type field to type[ZPOOL_MAX_TYPE_NAME]. Remove redundant type field from struct zpool and use zpool->driver->type instead. The define will be used by zswap for its zpool param type name length.Patchset is fugly. All this putzing around with fixed-length strings, worrying about overflow and is-it-null-terminated-or-isnt-it. Shudder. It's much better to use variable-length strings everywhere. We're not operating in contexts which can't use kmalloc, we're not performance-intensive and these strings aren't being written to fixed-size fields on disk or anything. Why do we need any fixed-length strings? IOW, why not just replace that alloca with a kstrdup()?
for the zpool drivers (zbud and zsmalloc), the type is actually just statically assigned, e.g. .type = "zbud", so you're right the *type is better than type[]. I'll update it.
quoted
--- a/include/linux/zpool.h +++ b/include/linux/zpool.h...@@ -79,7 +77,7 @@ static struct zpool_driver *zpool_get_driver(char *type) spin_lock(&drivers_lock); list_for_each_entry(driver, &drivers_head, list) { - if (!strcmp(driver->type, type)) { + if (!strncmp(driver->type, type, ZPOOL_MAX_TYPE_NAME)) {Why strncmp? Please tell me these strings are always null-terminated.
Yep, you're right. The driver->type always is, and the type param is passed in from sysfs, which we can rely on to be null-terminated.
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>