Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] x86, mm: ZONE_DEVICE for "device memory"
From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-18 00:46:46
Also in:
lkml, nvdimm
From: Dan Williams <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-18 00:46:46
Also in:
lkml, nvdimm
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Jerome Glisse [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 07:11:27PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:quoted
Although it does not offer perfect protection if device memory is at a physically lower address than RAM, skipping the update of these variables does seem to be what we want. For example /dev/mem would fail to allow write access to persistent memory if it fails a valid_phys_addr_range() check. Since /dev/mem does not know how to write to PMEM in a reliably persistent way, it should not treat a PMEM-pfn like RAM.So i attach is a patch that should keep ZONE_DEVICE out of consideration for the buddy allocator. You might also want to keep page reserved and not free inside the zone, you could replace the generic_online_page() using set_online_page_callback() while hotpluging device memory.
Hmm, are we already protected by the fact that ZONE_DEVICE is not represented in the GFP_ZONEMASK? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>