On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:30:27PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:

I'd be interested in the comments of others, though, to see if there is 
any reservation about the hstate size breakdown.  It may actually find no 
current customer who is interested in parsing it.  (If we keep it, I would 
suggest the 'x' change to '*' similar to per-order breakdowns in 
show_mem()).  It may also be possible to add it later if a definitive 
usecase is presented.

I have no interest in parsing the size breakdown today.  I might change
my mind tomorrow and having the extra information hurts very little, so
I won't argue against it either.

But overall I'm very happy with the new addition and think it's a good 
solution to the problem.

Agreed.  Thank you!

Jorn

--
One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty
are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled
with doubt and indecision.
-- Bertrand Russell

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>