Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2015-05-05

Re: [patch v2 for-4.0] mm, thp: really limit transparent hugepage allocation to local node

From: Vlastimil Babka <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-25 10:52:32
Also in: lkml

On 02/25/2015 12:24 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
From: Greg Thelen <redacted>

Commit 077fcf116c8c ("mm/thp: allocate transparent hugepages on local
node") restructured alloc_hugepage_vma() with the intent of only
allocating transparent hugepages locally when there was not an effective
interleave mempolicy.

alloc_pages_exact_node() does not limit the allocation to the single
node, however, but rather prefers it.  This is because __GFP_THISNODE is
not set which would cause the node-local nodemask to be passed.  Without
it, only a nodemask that prefers the local node is passed.
Oops, good catch.
But I believe we have the same problem with khugepaged_alloc_page(), 
rendering the recent node determination and zone_reclaim strictness 
patches partially useless.

Then I start to wonder about other alloc_pages_exact_node() users. Some 
do pass __GFP_THISNODE, others not - are they also mistaken? I guess the 
function is a misnomer - when I see "exact_node", I expect the 
__GFP_THISNODE behavior.

I think to avoid such hidden catches, we should create 
alloc_pages_preferred_node() variant, change the exact_node() variant to 
pass __GFP_THISNODE, and audit and adjust all callers accordingly.

Also, you pass __GFP_NOWARN but that should be covered by GFP_TRANSHUGE 
already. Of course, nothing guarantees that hugepage == true implies 
that gfp == GFP_TRANSHUGE... but current in-tree callers conform to that.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Fix this by passing __GFP_THISNODE and falling back to small pages when
the allocation fails.

Fixes: 077fcf116c8c ("mm/thp: allocate transparent hugepages on local node")
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <redacted>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
  v2: GFP_THISNODE actually defers compaction and reclaim entirely based on
      the combination of gfp flags.  We want to try compaction and reclaim,
      so only set __GFP_THISNODE.  We still set __GFP_NOWARN to suppress
      oom warnings in the kernel log when we can simply fallback to small
      pages.

  mm/mempolicy.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1985,7 +1985,10 @@ retry_cpuset:
  		nmask = policy_nodemask(gfp, pol);
  		if (!nmask || node_isset(node, *nmask)) {
  			mpol_cond_put(pol);
-			page = alloc_pages_exact_node(node, gfp, order);
+			page = alloc_pages_exact_node(node, gfp |
+							    __GFP_THISNODE |
+							    __GFP_NOWARN,
+						      order);
  			goto out;
  		}
  	}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help