Thread (31 messages) 31 messages, 6 authors, 2015-01-28

Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'

From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-23 21:09:22
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-next, lkml

On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Wouldn't that have unintended consequences ? So far
rb tree nodes are allocated even if a node not online;
the above would change that. Are you saying it is
unnecessary to initialize rb tree nodes if the node
is not online ?
It is not advisable to allocate since an offline node means that the
structure cannot be allocated on the node where it would be most
beneficial. Typically subsystems allocate the per node data structures
when the node is brought online.
Not that I have any idea what is correct, it just seems odd
that the existing code would do all this allocation if it is not
necessary.
Not sure how the code there works just guessing from other subsystems.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help