Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 6 authors, 2014-09-09

Re: [PATCH 5/9 v2] SQUASHME: prd: Last fixes for partitions

From: Boaz Harrosh <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-26 08:18:13
Also in: linux-fsdevel

On 08/25/2014 11:10 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
<>
I think we can still have a working probe by instead comparing the passed in
dev_t against the dev_t we get back from disk_to_dev(prd->prd_disk), but I'd
really like a use case so I can test this.  Until then I think I'm just going
to stub out prd/pmem_probe() with a BUG() so we can see if anyone hits it.

It seems like this is preferable to just registering NULL for probe, as that
would cause an oops in kobj_lookup(() when probe() is blindly called without
checking for NULL.
I have a version I think you will love it removes the probe and bunch of
other stuff.

I tested it heavily it just works

Comming soon, I'm preparing trees right now
Thanks
Boaz

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help