Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2014-08-13

RE: [PATCH] mm: Actually clear pmd_numa before invalidating

From: Wilcox, Matthew R <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-13 20:16:38

I am quite shockingly ignorant of the MM code.  While looking at this function to figure out how/whether to use it, I noticed the bug, and sent a patch.  I assumed the gibberish in the changelog meant something important to people who actually understand this part of the kernel :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@linux-foundation.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:13 PM
To: Wilcox, Matthew R
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org; Mel Gorman; Rik van Riel; stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Actually clear pmd_numa before invalidating

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 20:04:02 +0000 "Wilcox, Matthew R" [off-list ref] wrote:
The commit log for 67f87463d3 explains what the runtime effects should have been.
No it doesn't.  In fact the sentence "The existing caller of
pmdp_invalidate should handle it but it's an inconsistent state for a
PMD." makes me suspect there are no end-user visible effects.

I don't know why we chose to backport that one into -stable and I don't
know why we should backport this one either.

Greg (and others) will look at this changelog and wonder "why".  It
should tell them.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help