* NeilBrown [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, 22 May 2014 11:05:02 +0200 Ingo Molnar [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

* NeilBrown [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

[[ get_maintainer.pl suggested 61 email address for this patch.
   I've trimmed that list somewhat.  Hope I didn't miss anyone
   important...
   I'm hoping it will go in through the scheduler tree, but would
   particularly like an Acked-by for the fscache parts.  Other acks
   welcome.
]]

The current "wait_on_bit" interface requires an 'action' function
to be provided which does the actual waiting.
There are over 20 such functions, many of them identical.
Most cases can be satisfied by one of just two functions, one
which uses io_schedule() and one which just uses schedule().

So:
 Rename wait_on_bit and        wait_on_bit_lock to
        wait_on_bit_action and wait_on_bit_lock_action
 to make it explicit that they need an action function.

 Introduce new wait_on_bit{,_lock} and wait_on_bit{,_lock}_io
 which are *not* given an action function but implicitly use
 a standard one.
 The decision to error-out if a signal is pending is now made
 based on the 'mode' argument rather than being encoded in the action
 function.

this patch fails to build on x86-32 allyesconfigs.

Could you share the build errors?

Sure, find it attached below.

quoted

Could we keep the old names for a while, and remove them in the next 
cycle or so?

I don't see how changing the names later rather than now will reduce the
chance of errors... maybe I'm missing something.

Well, it would reduce build errors?

Thanks,

	Ingo

====================>
fs/cifs/file.c: In function a??cifs_oplock_breaka??:
fs/cifs/file.c:3652:4: warning: passing argument 3 of a??wait_on_bita?? makes integer from pointer without a cast [enabled by default]
    cifs_pending_writers_wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
    ^
In file included from include/linux/fs.h:6:0,
                 from fs/cifs/file.c:24:
include/linux/wait.h:878:1: note: expected a??unsigned inta?? but argument is of type a??int (*)(void *)a??
 wait_on_bit(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
 ^
fs/cifs/file.c:3652:4: error: too many arguments to function a??wait_on_bita??
    cifs_pending_writers_wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
    ^
In file included from include/linux/fs.h:6:0,
                 from fs/cifs/file.c:24:
include/linux/wait.h:878:1: note: declared here
 wait_on_bit(void *word, int bit, unsigned mode)
 ^
  CC      kernel/smp.o
  CC      kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.o
make[2]: *** [fs/cifs/file.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
  CC      drivers/bcma/sprom.o
  CC      fs/btrfs/locking.o
  LD      sound/isa/ad1848/snd-ad1848.o
  LD      sound/isa/ad1848/built-in.o
  CC      sound/isa/cs423x/cs4231.o
  CC      lib/fonts/fonts.o
  CC      lib/fonts/font_sun8x16.o
  CC      drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.o
  CC      lib/fonts/font_sun12x22.o

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>