Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM ATTEND] persistent transparent large
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Date: 2014-01-28 22:24:34
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, James Bottomley wrote:
Then there's the meta problem of is XIP the right approach. Using persistence within the current memory address space as XIP is a natural fit for mixed volatile/NV systems, but what happens when they're all NV memory? Should we be discussing some VM based handling mechanisms for persistent memory?
Yes (but at present there's nothing on the table: is the cupboard bare?) Sorry, answer devoid of content, but since it's my thread... Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>