Re: [PATCH 10/16] fuse: Implement writepages callback
From: Maxim Patlasov <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-02 15:40:15
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
07/19/2013 08:50 PM, Miklos Szeredi D?D,N?DuN?:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 09:45:29PM +0400, Maxim Patlasov wrote:quoted
From: Pavel Emelyanov <redacted> The .writepages one is required to make each writeback request carry more than one page on it. The patch enables optimized behaviour unconditionally, i.e. mmap-ed writes will benefit from the patch even if fc->writeback_cache=0.I rewrote this a bit, so we won't have to do the thing in two passes, which makes it simpler and more robust. Waiting for page writeback here is wrong anyway, see comment above fuse_page_mkwrite(). BTW we had a race there because fuse_page_mkwrite() didn't take the page lock. I've also fixed that up and pushed a series containing these patches up to implementing ->writepages() to git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git writepages Passed some trivial testing but more is needed.
Thanks a lot for efforts. The approach you implemented looks promising, but it introduces the following assumption: a page cannot become dirty before we have a chance to wait on fuse writeback holding the page locked. This is already true for mmap-ed writes (due to your fixes) and it seems doable for cached writes as well (like we do in fuse_perform_write). But the assumption seems to be broken in case of direct read from local fs (e.g. ext4) to a memory region mmap-ed to a file on fuse fs. See how dio_bio_submit() marks pages dirty by bio_set_pages_dirty(). I can't see any solution for this use-case. Do you? Thanks, Maxim
I'll get to the rest of the patches next week. Thanks, Miklos
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>