Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 6 authors, 2013-08-05

Re: [PATCH V5 2/8] fs/ceph: vfs __set_page_dirty_nobuffers interface instead of doing it inside filesystem

From: Yan, Zheng <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-01 15:19:48
Also in: ceph-devel, cgroups, linux-fsdevel

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sha Zhengju [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Sha Zhengju <redacted>

Following we will begin to add memcg dirty page accounting around
__set_page_dirty_
{buffers,nobuffers} in vfs layer, so we'd better use vfs interface to
avoid exporting
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
those details to filesystems.

Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju <redacted>
---
 fs/ceph/addr.c |   13 +------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
index 3e68ac1..1445bf1 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
        if (unlikely(!mapping))
                return !TestSetPageDirty(page);

-       if (TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
+       if (!__set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page)) {
it's too early to set the radix tree tag here. We should set page's
snapshot context and increase the i_wrbuffer_ref first. This is because
once the tag is set, writeback thread can find and start flushing the page.

quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
                dout("%p set_page_dirty %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n",
                     mapping->host, page, page->index);
                return 0;
@@ -107,14 +107,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
             snapc, snapc->seq, snapc->num_snaps);
        spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);

-       /* now adjust page */
-       spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
        if (page->mapping) {    /* Race with truncate? */
-               WARN_ON_ONCE(!PageUptodate(page));
-               account_page_dirtied(page, page->mapping);
-               radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
-                               page_index(page), PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
-
this code was coped from __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(). I think the reason
Sage did this is to handle the race described in
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers()'s comment. But I'm wonder if "page->mapping ==
NULL" can still happen here. Because truncate_inode_page() unmap page from
processes's address spaces first, then delete page from page cache.

Regards
Yan, Zheng
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
                /*
                 * Reference snap context in page->private.  Also set
                 * PagePrivate so that we get invalidatepage callback.
@@ -126,14 +119,10 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
                undo = 1;
        }

-       spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);


-
        if (undo)
                /* whoops, we failed to dirty the page */
                ceph_put_wrbuffer_cap_refs(ci, 1, snapc);

-       __mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
-
        BUG_ON(!PageDirty(page));
        return 1;
 }
--
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help